Some may say that autocratic governments are preferable to democracies because they are more effective. It is true that autocratic regimes are able to adopt and implement policies more quickly. However, the power of democracy lies in its ability to change gradually. Complex issues should not be decided quickly and unilaterally by a leader; They should be discussed by large groups of people who study both sides of the problem until the majority is able to reach a consensus. Although grassroots associations, community-based organizations and online groups offer ways for political engagement, the space for youth representation in international politics remains tight and many young people still feel like passive participants in policy-making. Everyone`s thoughts? This is simply not true. Regardless of the culture in question, it will determine who gets a vote and who doesn`t. Children don`t vote, criminals don`t vote, and the mentally ill don`t vote, to name just a few examples. We can name these categories of non-voters and tell us that seems reasonable, but that`s because our culture has decided it`s reasonable. The real danger of democracy lies in the freedom for „everyone” to have a voice. There are many people who can vote legally but should not vote ethically.
As education continues to decline, especially in Western countries, people will be less and less qualified to make smart decisions. Simply put, many people simply do not have the intelligence or wisdom to make judgments about the categories of politics, society, and ethics. What about democracy as the „tyranny of the majority”? Obamacare, for example, was passed without the support of the opposition party. There is no empirical evidence that the undemocratic regime leads to smarter decisions, even on economic issues. Cuba and North Korea may not have large debts, but even if they were to suffer the „evil debts” of democracy, it is clear that they would be better economically. Do you know of a country without a democracy that, in your opinion, offers a better life, even economically for all its citizens? I like democracy because it theoretically gives me a say in my government. But in reality, representatives rarely represent me. I didn`t want us to attack Iraq after looking at the information available on the Internet, in books and in the media, but we did it twice.
I wanted universal health care and we didn`t. I wanted access to national forests to remain free for all, supported by our taxes, and that is not the case. We receive crumbs of bread from our government officials and turn away from their paid advisors and try to convince ourselves that what to think is right for us instead of acting to meet what we, the people, want and need. Democracies, especially those like the United States, seem to be entering into as many stupid wars as banana dictatorships. So I can`t even say that democracies are more peaceful. At least with a democracy, you don`t need to have an arrogant leader who usually embraces the rich and powerful aristocrat and his own family. Oh, wait. This page is interesting. All the points are well formulated, but democracy has obviously become a worse government than it should be. This question is all the more raised as democracy is threatened by various forces around the world. Some question the value of the referendum if it leads to seismic changes such as Brexit and the election of demagogues that threaten liberal values.
Historically, many thinkers have argued that democracy can only be harmful to a free and just society, and have characterized majority rule as inherently unstable, irrational, and a threat to private property. Liberal democracy provides, at least in theory, a mechanism for a form of government through proportional representation, with citizens empowered to bring about change through participation and persuade the powerful to act for the common good. The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy. I support you sir. Democracy is the form of government that recognizes every citizen as one. It improves the quality of decision-making. Although far from being a perfect political system, democracy is undoubtedly an important tool for achieving equality, reducing conflict and increasing civic engagement, making it the best system of government available. In fact, democracy does not have to be liberal. Some countries today have illiberal democracies where elections continue, but liberal traits such as an independent judiciary and a free press have been compromised.
But democracy is a process, not a state. Countries like Britain and the United States were not true democracies until relatively recently. British electoral law was gradually expanded from 1830 and it was not until 1918 that women gained the right to vote. In the United States, African Americans in their southern states did not gain the right to vote until 1965. Why is democracy important to the world and how does it contribute to the maintenance of a just and free society? All forms of government have their shortcomings, but on the whole, democracy has fewer. That doesn`t necessarily make it the „best,” but I think it has been statistically proven that democracy is a more effective form of government. As long as citizens are happy and human rights are not ignored, democracy is my government. In Europe and the English-speaking world, it is often assumed that democracy naturally takes the form of a liberal democracy – popular sovereignty, but limited by a constitution that guarantees individual freedoms (such as speech) and rights (such as a fair trial). It is crucial that these essential freedoms are not put to a democratic vote.
Democratic states almost always have freer people than autocratic states. They obviously have the right to vote for their government and therefore, in a broader sense, to determine the policies of their nation and what their nation should look like. They have more freedom of speech and expression than in autocracies. In particular, they are free to criticize their own government. The importance of liberal democracy is undoubtedly twofold: no other system of government guarantees the right to freedom of expression of political preferences; and no other system promotes progress through peaceful competition between different interests and ideas. Democracy is both good and bad, but I think it`s better. Let`s take an example, we, the Indian people, get the right to vote!! Right to freedom of speech and expression. Right of residence in any part of the country.
!! Isn`t that a big problem DEMOCRACY IS BETTER THAN AUTOCRACY. Recently, undemocratic and authoritarian governments like China have been praised for weathering the COVID-19 pandemic better than democracies because they are better able to impose specific behavior on citizens without worrying about individual freedoms or distancing themselves from a free press. First, different countries have different democracies. When you talk about parliamentary discussions, it does not matter, because there is always a majority party. Even at the top, what it does, it is enough to stop the decision-making process. A monarchy with philosophical/scholarly kings like Rama, Krishna, Bharta, Chandergupta, etc. is the best form of democracy ESSAY TOPIC: Is it important to live in a democracy? Democracy is good and bad. If used correctly, it is the best, but if it is abused, it is the worst. Currently, it is extremely abused, leading to security problems, corruption, economic losses, etc. The good part is that people can overthrow the government. and they should do it if they feel that leaders are abusing their power and you can bring voters to the polls if you want, but you can`t interest them in most issues. It`s an idea that sounds appealing if you`re one of those interested people (I`d love that), but if you`re trying to discuss political issues with most people, they`ll change the subject or politely nod without comment.
Many people are also interested in expressing their views, but have obviously not done any research on their validity. An elected representative may take longer to review the idea, discuss it with peers, and explain whether it contradicts public opinion. Of course, most politicians are weasels and will place public opinion above educated opinion, but the result of this is no worse than direct democracy. I live in the United States, which has had a democracy since day one, they always say freedom and justice for all, but they manage to exterminate one race of people and keep another in an eternal state of slavery for more than 100 years when they agreed to release them in 20 years and then deny them fundamental rights and freedoms to this day. Apart from the freedom to elect government, there is no reason why people under an autocracy cannot be as free as in a democracy. Some countries, such as Ghana, are seen as resilient democracies, while for others, the democratic transition is more fragile – after months of pro-democracy protests in Sudan in 2019, a civilian-led transitional government is now paving the way for democracy after decades of military rule. The greatest virtue of democracy is that it is a government of the people for the people. The government represents the views of the people who vote for it and can reject them if it does things that the people do not like. Unlike other forms of government, democracy is about the little man, everyone, not the elite, who are often separated from the way everyone lives their lives. Churchill said: „Democracy is the worst form of government, apart from all the other forms that have been tried from time to time.
Essentially, this democracy has many shortcomings and problems, but all the others have more problems. Now, authoritarian countries like China can challenge this assumption by proving that authoritarian regimes are better at creating economic growth. .